Published assessment rules
How you are assessed
These rules are published so you know, before you start, how every mark is reached and how to question it. They follow the Council on Higher Education's policy on assessment (2016), which requires published marking and aggregation rules, internal and external moderation and an open appeal process, and section 71 of the Protection of Personal Information Act, which means no result about you is decided by a machine alone. UMP's own General Rules govern the formal award.
Grade bands
| Distinction | 70 to 100 | Outstanding: critical, well evidenced and original, applied convincingly to the mining context. |
| Merit | 60 to 69 | Very good: sound analysis and clear application, with some depth missing. |
| Pass | 50 to 59 | Satisfactory: meets the outcomes, but the analysis is mostly descriptive. |
| Not yet competent | 0 to 49 | Does not yet meet the outcomes. Failed components may be reassessed once. |
To pass a module you need 50% overall and at least 40% in any component worth 30% or more. All six credit-bearing modules passed and Module 7 judged Competent. Credit-weighted average of at least 70, no module below 60, and observed components that confirm the written work.
What the tool scores, and how
- Unit quizzes. One scored attempt each, with questions drawn for you from a bank. Answers lock when you submit. Keys and explanations are released when the quiz window closes. Your lowest quiz in each module is dropped.
- Decision scenarios and simulations. Your first complete run of each scenario and simulation counts. You may replay to learn; replays are not scored.
- Exercises. One scored attempt; the full workings are shown afterwards.
- Partial credit. Single choice: 1 or 0. Multiple response: Each correct choice earns its share, each wrong choice takes a share away, never below 0. Numeric: Full marks within the stated tolerance, otherwise 0. Order: Share of neighbouring pairs in the right order. Categorise: Share of items placed in the right group. There is no negative marking.
- Peer review. Median of the peer scores for each rubric criterion, then confirmed or changed by a marker.
Generative AI
Every written task shows one of three positions. Where AI is allowed you must declare how you used it.
- Position 1. No AI use. The task tests your own unaided work.
- Position 2. Limited AI use, declared. You may use AI to check language or brainstorm; say how you used it.
- Position 3. Full AI use, declared. You may use AI throughout; say how, and take responsibility for every claim.
Each module also has at least one observed component, such as a presentation, an oral defence, a live simulation or an invigilated examination, so the panel can confirm that your written work is your own.
From calculation to release
- Calculated: the tool scores the item or applies the rubric scores entered
- Marker confirmed: a named marker confirms or changes every mark
- Internally moderated: a sample is checked by someone not involved in teaching the module
- Externally moderated: summative tasks are checked by an independent external moderator
- Ratified: the assessment committee approves the results
- Released: you see your result, how it was calculated, and how to make representations
Written feedback is returned within 15 working days. One reassessment of a failed component only, capped at 50. After release you may make representations within 14 days; a named member of staff reviews them and replies in writing.
Study period and certificate
You are approved for your cohort's study period. Each module opens and closes on set dates inside it: after a module closes, its scored online activities close and the quiz answers are released. Access to the programme ends after the last day of the study period.
At the end of the programme, everyone who has met the completion rule (all six credit-bearing modules passed and Module 7 judged Competent.) receives a numbered programme Certificate of Completion from the University of Mpumalanga. Each module is also an online certificate course of about six weeks: complete it online (work through the lessons, take each weekly quiz, and pass its online graded work with an average of at least 50%) and you receive that course's own certificate, issued by the programme office. Every certificate can be verified at /verify with its number or QR code.
Module weights
Module 1: Strategic Leadership in the Mining and Minerals Sector
| Unit retrieval quizzes | Unit quizzes, scored by the tool | 10% |
| Downturn simulation and decision scenarios | Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person | 10% |
| Cold calls, walls and discussion quality | Quality of participation, judged by a person | 5% |
| Strategic diagnostic of own operation | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 30% |
| Strategy proposal | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 30% |
| Board-style presentation to a panel | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | 15% |
| Syndicate case analysis and presentation | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | Formative |
Module 2: Mining Governance and Leadership
| Unit retrieval quizzes | Unit quizzes, scored by the tool | 10% |
| Decision scenarios: critical control safety and stakeholder blockade | Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person | 10% |
| Governance and stakeholder map of own operation | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 30% |
| Stakeholder engagement strategy with grievance mechanism and dialogue plan | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 40% |
| Oral defence of the engagement strategy | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | 10% |
| Multi-stakeholder dialogue simulation: preparation brief and reflection | Quality of participation, judged by a person | Formative |
Module 3: ESG and Sustainability in Mining
| Unit retrieval quizzes | Unit quizzes, scored by the tool | 15% |
| ESG decision scenarios: water, community and closure, tailings | Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person | 15% |
| Applied valuation exercises: carbon tax and closure liability | Calculation exercises scored by the tool | 10% |
| ESG risk brief (peer reviewed) | Written work scored by three peers (median per criterion) and confirmed by a person | 20% |
| Integrated ESG case examination (invigilated, at the venue) | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | 40% |
Module 4: Digital Transformation and the 4IR in Mining
| Unit retrieval quizzes | Unit quizzes, scored by the tool | 10% |
| Decision log: autonomous haulage change simulation and cyber incident scenario | Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person | 10% |
| Digital maturity assessment of own operation | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 30% |
| Digital transformation roadmap, business case and workforce transition plan | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 40% |
| Board pitch with questions | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | 10% |
| Change simulation syndicate debrief | Quality of participation, judged by a person | Formative |
Module 5: Critical Minerals, JET and International Benchmarking
| Unit retrieval quizzes | Unit quizzes, scored by the tool | 10% |
| Multi-stakeholder critical minerals negotiation simulation (live) | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | 30% |
| Study tour benchmarking log (or virtual benchmarking log) | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 10% |
| International benchmarking report | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 50% |
| Practice scenario and negotiation simulation (formative) | Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person | Formative |
Module 6: Financial Governance, Investment and Value Creation in Mining
| Unit retrieval quizzes | Unit quizzes, scored by the tool | 15% |
| Numeric modelling exercises | Calculation exercises scored by the tool | 20% |
| Mine investment decision under a commodity price shock | Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person | 10% |
| Financing strategy memo | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | 15% |
| Invigilated case examination | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | 40% |
Module 7: Executive Leadership Coaching Capstone
| Coaching triad observations | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | Required |
| Reflective coaching journal | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | Required |
| Coaching impact evaluation plan | Written work marked against the rubric by a person | Required |
| Capstone report and executive panel presentation | Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel | Required |
| Coaching conversation scenarios (formative practice) | Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person | Required |