Published assessment rules

How you are assessed

These rules are published so you know, before you start, how every mark is reached and how to question it. They follow the Council on Higher Education's policy on assessment (2016), which requires published marking and aggregation rules, internal and external moderation and an open appeal process, and section 71 of the Protection of Personal Information Act, which means no result about you is decided by a machine alone. UMP's own General Rules govern the formal award.

Grade bands

Distinction70 to 100Outstanding: critical, well evidenced and original, applied convincingly to the mining context.
Merit60 to 69Very good: sound analysis and clear application, with some depth missing.
Pass50 to 59Satisfactory: meets the outcomes, but the analysis is mostly descriptive.
Not yet competent0 to 49Does not yet meet the outcomes. Failed components may be reassessed once.

To pass a module you need 50% overall and at least 40% in any component worth 30% or more. All six credit-bearing modules passed and Module 7 judged Competent. Credit-weighted average of at least 70, no module below 60, and observed components that confirm the written work.

What the tool scores, and how

Generative AI

Every written task shows one of three positions. Where AI is allowed you must declare how you used it.

Each module also has at least one observed component, such as a presentation, an oral defence, a live simulation or an invigilated examination, so the panel can confirm that your written work is your own.

From calculation to release

  1. Calculated: the tool scores the item or applies the rubric scores entered
  2. Marker confirmed: a named marker confirms or changes every mark
  3. Internally moderated: a sample is checked by someone not involved in teaching the module
  4. Externally moderated: summative tasks are checked by an independent external moderator
  5. Ratified: the assessment committee approves the results
  6. Released: you see your result, how it was calculated, and how to make representations

Written feedback is returned within 15 working days. One reassessment of a failed component only, capped at 50. After release you may make representations within 14 days; a named member of staff reviews them and replies in writing.

Study period and certificate

You are approved for your cohort's study period. Each module opens and closes on set dates inside it: after a module closes, its scored online activities close and the quiz answers are released. Access to the programme ends after the last day of the study period.

At the end of the programme, everyone who has met the completion rule (all six credit-bearing modules passed and Module 7 judged Competent.) receives a numbered programme Certificate of Completion from the University of Mpumalanga. Each module is also an online certificate course of about six weeks: complete it online (work through the lessons, take each weekly quiz, and pass its online graded work with an average of at least 50%) and you receive that course's own certificate, issued by the programme office. Every certificate can be verified at /verify with its number or QR code.

Module weights

Module 1: Strategic Leadership in the Mining and Minerals Sector
Unit retrieval quizzesUnit quizzes, scored by the tool10%
Downturn simulation and decision scenariosScenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person10%
Cold calls, walls and discussion qualityQuality of participation, judged by a person5%
Strategic diagnostic of own operationWritten work marked against the rubric by a person30%
Strategy proposalWritten work marked against the rubric by a person30%
Board-style presentation to a panelPresentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel15%
Syndicate case analysis and presentationWritten work marked against the rubric by a personFormative
Module 2: Mining Governance and Leadership
Unit retrieval quizzesUnit quizzes, scored by the tool10%
Decision scenarios: critical control safety and stakeholder blockadeScenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person10%
Governance and stakeholder map of own operationWritten work marked against the rubric by a person30%
Stakeholder engagement strategy with grievance mechanism and dialogue planWritten work marked against the rubric by a person40%
Oral defence of the engagement strategyPresentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel10%
Multi-stakeholder dialogue simulation: preparation brief and reflectionQuality of participation, judged by a personFormative
Module 3: ESG and Sustainability in Mining
Unit retrieval quizzesUnit quizzes, scored by the tool15%
ESG decision scenarios: water, community and closure, tailingsScenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person15%
Applied valuation exercises: carbon tax and closure liabilityCalculation exercises scored by the tool10%
ESG risk brief (peer reviewed)Written work scored by three peers (median per criterion) and confirmed by a person20%
Integrated ESG case examination (invigilated, at the venue)Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel40%
Module 4: Digital Transformation and the 4IR in Mining
Unit retrieval quizzesUnit quizzes, scored by the tool10%
Decision log: autonomous haulage change simulation and cyber incident scenarioScenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person10%
Digital maturity assessment of own operationWritten work marked against the rubric by a person30%
Digital transformation roadmap, business case and workforce transition planWritten work marked against the rubric by a person40%
Board pitch with questionsPresentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel10%
Change simulation syndicate debriefQuality of participation, judged by a personFormative
Module 5: Critical Minerals, JET and International Benchmarking
Unit retrieval quizzesUnit quizzes, scored by the tool10%
Multi-stakeholder critical minerals negotiation simulation (live)Presentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel30%
Study tour benchmarking log (or virtual benchmarking log)Written work marked against the rubric by a person10%
International benchmarking reportWritten work marked against the rubric by a person50%
Practice scenario and negotiation simulation (formative)Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a personFormative
Module 6: Financial Governance, Investment and Value Creation in Mining
Unit retrieval quizzesUnit quizzes, scored by the tool15%
Numeric modelling exercisesCalculation exercises scored by the tool20%
Mine investment decision under a commodity price shockScenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a person10%
Financing strategy memoWritten work marked against the rubric by a person15%
Invigilated case examinationPresentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panel40%
Module 7: Executive Leadership Coaching Capstone
Coaching triad observationsPresentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panelRequired
Reflective coaching journalWritten work marked against the rubric by a personRequired
Coaching impact evaluation planWritten work marked against the rubric by a personRequired
Capstone report and executive panel presentationPresentation, oral defence, live simulation or invigilated examination, marked by a panelRequired
Coaching conversation scenarios (formative practice)Scenario and simulation decisions scored by the tool, with a written rationale marked by a personRequired